Why does color matter?
Companies have long utilized colors
in order to make their goods appear more appealing to consumers. Color and design play a significant role in
the consumer experience. In fact, color
is the most influential visual cue with respect to inspiring purchases. The following infographic from KissMetrics,
based on “The Effects of Store Environment On Shopping Behaviors” by Shun Yin Lam, details the tremendous impact color has on purchases.
(Source)
The above graphic clearly
demonstrates that consumers value a product’s visual appearance above all other
factors when shopping. The same is true
for food products. Mike Adams from
Natural News discusses in this article how color triggers humans’ innate
perceptions about the nutritional value of food items. Humans are wired to view vibrant foods as
healthy; the more saturated the color, the better. By using artificially saturated colors, food
manufacturers take advantage of humans’ inherent attraction to colorful food in
order to improve sales.
Artificial Food Colorants & Aquaculture
There is an immense market for
artificial food colorants because of the direct relationship between colors and
how appetizing a food product appears.
This is particularly true for the aquaculture industry. According to a 2009 Stanford study,
farmed fish account for approximately half of total global fish consumption.
Salmon, particularly Atlantic salmon, is one
of the most important fish groups in aquaculture. As much as 95 percent of
Atlantic salmon sold in American supermarkets is farm-raised.
Though fish farms have significantly increased the quantity of salmon
available for consumption, these farms are not conducive to the development of
salmon’s characteristic vibrant pink and orange hue. The natural color of a farmed salmon’s flesh
is significantly less colorful when compared to their wild counterparts. Typically, the flesh of a farm raised salmon
is an unappetizing greyish color. As such, farm-raised salmon must be
dyed in order to be marketable to consumers.
Carophyll and the SalmoFan
Hoffman-La Roche is a pharmaceutical
company that produces a range of dyes, which are used in salmon feed in order
to alter the color of farm-raised salmon.
The synthetic color consumed by aquaculture fish is called Carophyll. Carophyll has been used for over 20 years for agricultural products and approximately 10 years in the aquaculture industry. It has been used in all major aquaculture countries, particularly the United States and the European Union. Hoffman-La Roche gives salmon farmers the
option of selecting the shade of pink they would like included in their salmon
food pellets with a color chart called the “SalmoFan.”
The entire process is much like selecting a
paint color at a hardware or home supplies store. With color additives,
producers of farmed salmon are able to deliver consistently colored salmon,
without any of the benefits associated with the naturally occurring pigment in
wild salmon. More information from the
manufacturer of Carophyll can be found here.
Wild vs. Farmed Salmon
Carophyll mimics astaxanthin, a
naturally occurring carteroid that gives shrimp, lobster, crab and salmon their
bright hue. Many health experts recommend eating
astaxanthin rich foods, or taking astaxanthin supplements because this
carteriod acts as a strong antioxidant, which supports good health. Instead of astaxanthin, canthaxanthin is used to improve salmon's color. Canthaxanthin is a carteroid that lacks the many benefits of astaxanthin because it is produced synthetically.
The use of Carophyll (and canthaxanthin) is not necessarily harmful, this colorant merely lacks the benefits of naturally occurring astaxanthin. However, there were some concerns that canthaxanthin can cause retina damage:
"If ingested in sufficient quantity, canthaxanthin can form crystalline deposits on the retina. In the 1990s, driven largely by the use of relatively large oral doses of canthaxanthin in "tanning pills" (taken to give skin a suntanned color without the dangers of sun exposure), the Scientific Committee of Food of the European Union set standards for human canthaxanthin intake. While noting that the effects of canthaxanthin on eyesight were minor, reversible, and "not associated clinically with any significant adverse functional visual defects," the committee established a maximum allowable daily intake (ADI) of 0.03 milligrams of canthaxanthin per kilogram of body weight. Based on this standard, the committee in January 2003 reduced the maximum allowable portion of canthaxanthin in salmonid feed from 80 ppm to 25 ppm (no such action levels exist for astaxanthin)." (Source)
The restrictions on the acceptable amount of canthaxanthin in salmon feed prevent this potential eye damage, however minimal.
Carophyll has none of the health benefits associated with astaxanthin. As such, farm-raised salmon are significantly less nutritious when compared to their wild counterparts. The following infographic details additional differences with respect to nutrition between wild and farmed-raised salmon.
The use of Carophyll (and canthaxanthin) is not necessarily harmful, this colorant merely lacks the benefits of naturally occurring astaxanthin. However, there were some concerns that canthaxanthin can cause retina damage:
"If ingested in sufficient quantity, canthaxanthin can form crystalline deposits on the retina. In the 1990s, driven largely by the use of relatively large oral doses of canthaxanthin in "tanning pills" (taken to give skin a suntanned color without the dangers of sun exposure), the Scientific Committee of Food of the European Union set standards for human canthaxanthin intake. While noting that the effects of canthaxanthin on eyesight were minor, reversible, and "not associated clinically with any significant adverse functional visual defects," the committee established a maximum allowable daily intake (ADI) of 0.03 milligrams of canthaxanthin per kilogram of body weight. Based on this standard, the committee in January 2003 reduced the maximum allowable portion of canthaxanthin in salmonid feed from 80 ppm to 25 ppm (no such action levels exist for astaxanthin)." (Source)
The restrictions on the acceptable amount of canthaxanthin in salmon feed prevent this potential eye damage, however minimal.
Carophyll has none of the health benefits associated with astaxanthin. As such, farm-raised salmon are significantly less nutritious when compared to their wild counterparts. The following infographic details additional differences with respect to nutrition between wild and farmed-raised salmon.
Salmon
is often touted for its significant health benefits; unfortunately the vast
majority of salmon sold in American markets do not live up to the hype. According to the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, farmed salmon contains twice the total fat and more than twice the
amount of saturated fat compared to wild salmon. The above table also demonstrates that salmon
produced in aquaculture farms are not as rich in healthy Omega-3 fatty
acids. Furthermore, farm raised salmon
are generally more calorific and have a higher “bad” (Omega-6) fat
percentage. According to researchers at
puresalmon.org, wild “heart healthy” salmon are exceptionally rich in Omega-3
fatty acids while containing less than 1% body fat. Contrarily, the body fat concentration of
farm-raised salmon can be as high as 27%.
So what can a consumer who wants the
health benefits of truly wild salmon do to ensure they are buying the right
product? Health expert, Mark Sisson, suggests buying less salmon in general in order to afford more
expensive, genuine wild salmon. He also
advocates purchasing canned salmon.
Farmed salmon does not can as well as wild salmon, which means that the
bulk of canned salmon is wild.
No comments:
Post a Comment